Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 25, 2022
Accepted
February 6, 2023
Published
April 19, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 684 Download : 6765

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Indonesia's administration experienced big-bang decentralization during the reform period, with its major milestone being Regional Autonomy. One of the follow-ups to the Law is establishing several Non-Departmental Government Agencies in 2001, one of which is the Indonesian Food and Drug Authority (BPOM). BPOM is a central agency with apparatuses in 33 provincial capitals and 40 districts/cities. Road Map of Bureaucratic Reform 2020-2024 mentions that Indonesia manages three paradigms of public administration in parallel, ranging from Weberian to New Public Service. NPS comes as a criticism of the Old Public Administration and New Public Management, whose primary focus is citizens. This research uses a qualitative approach to place NPS in drug and food surveillance in Indonesia, whose function is run by BPOM.  NPS consists of 7 main principles, and each has conformity with the implementation of drug and food supervision in Indonesia. The circulation of commodities such as Drugs cannot be viewed as limited to NPM considering that in addition to BPOM as a service provider and the pharmaceutical industry as a service recipient, there are also people who will directly impact drugs and food circulating in Indonesia. Based on this conformity, it is recommended that BPOM emphasize the significance of the NPS paradigm as a public administration perspective embraced by the organization and contain it on organizational documents so that stakeholders understand BPOM's performing patterns and the concurrent public administration paradigm.

Keywords

administrasi publik BPOM new public service Indonesian FDA new public service public administration

Article Details

How to Cite
Dharma, A. A. S. (2023). New Public Service Sebagai Paradigma Administrasi Publik Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan. Eruditio : Indonesia Journal of Food and Drug Safety, 3(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.54384/eruditio.v3i1.128
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adiyudha, R. (2021). Dewas KPK Bantah Lindungi Lili Pintauli Siregar. Republika. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/r1mwhd428/dewas-kpk-bantah-lindungi-lili-pintauli-siregar
  2. Alim, S., Nisa, A. K., & Hair, A. (2019). New Public Service In Bandung Through The Concept Of Smart City. Journal of Politics and Policy, 2(1), 95–108.
  3. Baciu, A., Stratton, K., & Burke, S. P. (2007). The future of drug safety: Promoting and protecting the health of the public. In The Future of Drug Safety: Promoting and Protecting the Health of the Public. https://doi.org/10.17226/11750
  4. Badano, G. (2020). The Principle of Restraint: Public Reason and the Reform of Public Administration. Political Studies, 68(1), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719831984
  5. BPOM. (2020a). Laporan Kinerja Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Tahun 2019. https://www.pom.go.id/new/admin/dat/20200429/Laporan_Kinerja_2019_Badan_Pengawas_Obat_dan_Makanan.pdf
  6. BPOM. (2020b). Rencana Strategis Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Tahun 2020-2024. BPOM.
  7. Creswell, W. J., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications Inc.
  8. Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering (Fourth Edi). Routledge.
  9. Desrina, S. A. (2020). Hubungan Kewenangan Pusat dan Daerah dalam Pengawasan Obat di Apotek. University Of Bengkulu Law Journal, 5(1), 12–34. https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.5.1.12-34
  10. Dharma, A. A. S. (2021a). Citizen Engagement Pada Pemanfaatan Media Sosial Pemerintah Untuk Komunikasi, Informasi, dan Edukasi (KIE) Pengembangan Vaksin COVID-19. Universitas Indonesia.
  11. Dharma, A. A. S. (2021b). The Manifestation of New Public Service Principles in Issuance of Emergency Use Authorization of COVID-19 Vaccine by BPOM. NeoRespublica: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 2(2), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.52423/neores.v2i2.17888
  12. Downing, N. S., Aminawung, J. A., Shah, N. D., Braunstein, J. B., Krumholz, H. M., & Ross, J. S. (2012). Regulatory Review of Novel Therapeutics — Comparison of Three Regulatory Agencies. The New England Journal of Medicine, 366(24), 2284–2293. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1200223
  13. Gusmano, M. K. (2013). FDA decisions and public deliberation: Challenges and opportunities. Public Administration Review, 73(SUPPL.1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12121
  14. Löffler, E., & Martin, S. (2016). Citizen Engagement. In T. Bovaird & E. Löffler (Eds.), Public Management and Governance (Third Ed., pp. 522–542). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203634219
  15. McCurdy, H. E. (1995). Fiction and Imagination: How They Affect Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 499–506.
  16. Mudrikah, E. D., & Dharma, A. A. S. (2021). Loka Pengawas Obat dan Makanan: Transformasi New Public Service dalam Reformasi Administrasi BPOM. Administratio, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.23960/administratio.v12i1.203
  17. Mudrikah, E. D., & Salomo, R. V. (2021). Stakeholder Engagement Dalam Perancangan Indikator Kinerja Pengawasan Obat. SAWALA Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 9(1), 67–88.
  18. Nurmasari, & Hafis, R. I. Al. (2019). Desentralisasi Asimetris: Kemiskinan Ditengah Kelimpahan Otonomi Khusus Papua. JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 5(2), 1180–1192.
  19. O’Sullivan, E., Rassel, G., Berner, M., & Taliaferro, J. D. (2017). Research Methods for Public Administrators. Routledge.
  20. Riccucci, N. M. (2001). The “Old” Public Management versus the “New” Public Management: Where Does Public Administration Fit in? Public Administration Review, 61(2), 172–175. http://www.jstor.org/stable/977450
  21. Rochwulaningsih, Y., Sulistiyono, S. T., Masruroh, N. N., & Maulany, N. N. (2019). Marine policy basis of Indonesia as a maritime state: The importance of integrated economy. Marine Policy, 108(March 2016), 103602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103602
  22. Santika, N., Taufik, T., & Savitri, D. (2021). Efektivitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah: Peran Moderasi Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah. CURRENT Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini, 2(2), 319–338.
  23. Sende, I. F., Pramudita, A. W., Salafuddin, M. G., & Yunianto, E. P. (2020). Peredaran Kosmetik Pemutih Ilegal di Indonesia dan Upaya Penanggulangannya. Eruditio, 1(1), 48–62.
  24. Sudewo, P. A. (2021). Tantangan Kebijakan Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan dalam Mendukung Peningkatan Daya Saing, Ekonomi dan Bisnis di Indonesia. Eruditio, 1(2), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.54384/eruditio.v1i2.79
  25. Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact (Second Ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
  26. Wicaksono, K. W. (2019). Transforming The Spirit Of New Public Service Into Public Management Reform In Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 2(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v2i1.20190