Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 31, 2023
Accepted
August 26, 2025
Published
September 30, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2 Download : 1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Referring to the previous 2020-2024 RPJMN period, it has been identified that the existing court decision indicators for convictions do not encompass all functions within the Deputy of Law Enforcement of The Indonesian Food and Drug Authority (Indonesian FDA), thereby failing to holistically represent the effectiveness of law enforcement against drug and food crimes. One strategic activity not reflected in these indicators is the crime vulnerability mapping function within the Law Enforcement Dashboard (ADP). However, the crime vulnerability mapping system remains limited due to its inability to assign weighted values based on the accuracy of information during data input. Addressing this issue, a study was conducted to develop a crime vulnerability score for drug and food crimes based on information source criteria, serving as a proposed consideration for designing performance indicators for the upcoming RPJMN period. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study utilized quantitative methods through Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and qualitative methods through surveys, involving 33 respondents from diverse backgrounds. The findings revealed that the highest-weighted information source criteria in assessing crime vulnerability were Investigation Results on Drugs and Food (0.225), Intelligence Operations Results on Drugs and Food (0.150), and Surveillance Results on Drugs and Food (0.141). These findings can be further elaborated through broader surveys involving experts in drug and food crime prevention, enabling the proposed "Drug and Food Crime Vulnerability Index" to be advanced as an output indicator for the Indonesian FDA Law Enforcement program objectives.

Keywords

crime vulnerability crime prevention output indicator of law enforcement food and drug kerawanan kejahatan cegah tangkal indikator keluaran penindakan Obat dan Makanan

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Fauziah, P., Wibowo, A., Dwi Anggraeni Puspa Handoko, Y., & Indriyana, I. (2025). Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach in Determining the Weight of Crime Vulnerability Information in Food and Drug Control. Eruditio : Indonesia Journal of Food and Drug Safety, 5(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.54384/eruditio.v5i2.182
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Babenko, A., Tarasenko, R., & Ostrohliadov, O. (2019). Mapping method in the research of drug crime regional criminological features (Ukraine taken as an example). SHS Web of Conferences, 68, 01011. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196801011
  2. Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan. (2022). Laporan Tahunan Badan POM Tahun 2022.
  3. Barnum, J. D., Campbell, W. L., Trocchio, S., Caplan, J. M., & Kennedy, L. W. (2017). Examining the Environmental Characteristics of Drug Dealing Locations. Crime and Delinquency, 63(13), 1731–1756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716649735
  4. Deng, Y., He, R., & Liu, Y. (2023). Crime risk prediction incorporating geographical spatiotemporal dependency into machine learning models. Information Sciences, 646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119414
  5. Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (2015). Crime Place in Crime Theory. Criminal Justice Press.
  6. Ellis, L., Farrington, D. P., & Hoskin, A. W. (2019). Demographic Factors. In Handbook of Crime Correlates (pp. 47–103). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-804417-9.00002-8
  7. García, M. L. (2020). Vulnerability assessment process inputs—establish protection objectives. In Handbook of Loss Prevention and Crime Prevention (pp. 111–123). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-817273-5.00012-0
  8. Halford, E., Giannoulis, M., Condon, C., & Keningale, P. (2024). Do hotspot policing interventions against optimal foragers cause crime displacement? International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100654
  9. Keputusan Direktur Jenderal bea dan Cukai Nomor KEP-198/BC/2020 tentang Rencana Strategis Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai Tahun 2020-2024. (n.d.).
  10. Keputusan Kepala Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Republik Indonesia Nomor HK.02.02.1.2.01.22.12 Tahun 2022 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Cegah Tangkal Kejahatan Obat dan Makanan. (n.d.).
  11. Nawawi, J., Darmawati, Tajuddin, M. A., & Nutakor, B. S. M. (2023). The Law Enforcement of Cyber Crime by Involving the Role of the Cyber Patrol Society in Achieving Justice. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 11(3), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i3.1289
  12. Peraturan Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Nomor 9 Tahun 2020 tentang Rencana Strategis Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Tahun 2020-2024. (n.d.).
  13. Peraturan Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan. (n.d.).
  14. Peraturan Kepala Badan Narkotika Nasional Nomor 6 Tahun 2020 tentang Rencana Strategis Badan Pengawas Narkotika Nasional Tahun 2020-2024. (n.d.).
  15. Quesada-Ruiz, L. C., García-Romero, L., & Ferrer-Valero, N. (2023). Mapping Environmental Crime to Characterize Human Impacts on Islands: An Applied and Methodological Research in Canary Islands. Journal of Environmental Management, 346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118959
  16. Rossmo, D. K. (2021). Dissecting a Criminal Investigation. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 36(4), 639–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09434-1
  17. Saaty, R. W. (1987). The Analytic Hierarchy Process - What It is and How It is Used. Mathl Modelling, 9(5), 161–176.
  18. Silberglitt, R. S., Chow, B. G., Hollywood, J. S., Woods, D., Zaydman, Mikhail, & Jackson, B. A. (2015). Visions of law enforcement technology in the period 2024-2034 : Report of the Law Enforcement Futuring Workshop. RAND Corporation.
  19. Snaphaan, T., Hardyns, W., Pauwels, L. J. R., & Bowers, K. (2024). Rating places and crime prevention: Exploring user-generated ratings to assess place management. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2024.102088
  20. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. (n.d.).
  21. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2011 tentang Intelijen Negara. (n.d.).
  22. Wulur, N. (2017). Keterangan Ahli dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Putusan Hakim. Lex Crimen, VI(2).